Skip to main content

The Risks of Voting NO – What You Need to Know

By March 18, 20252 minute read

Every decision has consequences, and for users, Zettai’s Restructuring is about recovering their assets and shaping a stable path forward. Currently, the Creditors are at a critical point where they are given a choice to support or oppose the Restructuring Scheme.

In uncertainty, the instinct to wait for the “safest option” may feel like a smart choice. And, such a decision makes a meaningful difference. We’re grateful to our users for considering the choices ahead.

Not supporting the Restructuring Scheme won’t open the door to better alternatives—it’ll lead to prolonged delays, lower recoveries, and a complete loss of control over the process, and will force the company to liquidation. Liquidation is a lengthy and unpredictable process that could leave Creditors with far less than they expect.

Before making your decision, here’s what a NO vote would lead to:

  • Delays Until 2027-2030

Liquidation can’t begin until the ownership dispute is resolved, leading to long delays. Creditors will have to wait years—potentially until 2027-2030—before even the First Distribution occurs.

  • Lower Recoveries

Liquidation comes with high costs, including legal, operational, and administrative fees, which will reduce the amount creditors receive.

  • No Market Gains

Distributions will be in fiat, meaning there will be no exposure to the market upside. In contrast, Restructuring allows creditors to receive distributions in tokens, preserving market exposure.

  • No Profit Sharing

The platform will shut down, all the operations will cease, and there will be no future profit to share with Creditors. The Restructuring Scheme, on the other hand, lets Creditors earn from future platform profits, including revenue from the planned DEX launch.

  • Limited Control

Creditors will have little say in the Liquidation process. A liquidator will decide how assets are handled, with no input from creditors.

Making A Decision That Shapes Your Future

Voting NO isn’t just rejecting the Restructuring Scheme—it’s choosing years of waiting, lower recoveries, and complete uncertainty. Liquidation eliminates market upside, future earnings, and creditor influence over the process.

A YES vote, on the other hand, provides a faster, structured, and more rewarding recovery path—one that ensures higher returns (~85% of the Rebalanced NLPA), profit-sharing, and control over the outcome.

The choice is clear: Move forward with confidence or risk an uncertain and prolonged waiting period.

Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency is not a legal tender and is currently unregulated. Kindly ensure that you undertake sufficient risk assessment when trading cryptocurrencies as they are often subject to high price volatility. The information provided in this section doesn't represent any investment advice or WazirX's official position. WazirX reserves the right in its sole discretion to amend or change this blog post at any time and for any reasons without prior notice.
Participate in the Indian Crypto Movement. Share:

Leave a Reply

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.