Skip to main content

Terra Luna (LUNA) Vs. Terra Luna Classic (LUNC)

By September 25, 2023December 1st, 20234 minute read

In the ever-evolving world of cryptos, new tokens and projects are constantly emerging, each with unique features and goals. Terra, a blockchain platform, has two prominent assets under its ecosystem: Terra Luna (LUNA) and Terra Luna Classic (LUNC). While sharing some similarities, these two tokens have distinct differences that set them apart.

In this article, we will delve deep into the details of Terra Luna and Terra Luna Classic, exploring their origins, purposes, and key differentiators.

Terra Luna

Terra Luna, often referred to simply as LUNA, is the original token of the Terra blockchain ecosystem. Terra, founded by Daniel Shin and Do Kwon in 2018, was created to bring stability to the world of crypto. It achieves this by utilizing a unique algorithmic stablecoin called TerraUSD (UST). LUNA plays a pivotal role within this ecosystem, acting as collateral for the creation and stability of TerraUSD.

One of the most notable features of Terra Luna is its use of a dual-token system. LUNA holders can stake their tokens to mint TerraUSD, a process known as Terraform Labs (TFL). This helps maintain the peg of TerraUSD to the US dollar by controlling the supply of TerraUSD in circulation. In addition to stability, LUNA also serves as a governance token, giving holders a say in the decision-making process within the Terra ecosystem.

Key Features of Terra Luna (LUNA):

  • Stability Mechanism: LUNA is the collateral asset for TerraUSD (UST), a stablecoin designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the US dollar. LUNA’s stability mechanism involves supply adjustments to control the value of UST.
  • Dual-Token System: Terra employs a dual-token system where LUNA holders can stake their tokens to mint TerraUSD, helping to manage the stability of the ecosystem.
  • Governance Rights: LUNA holders have governance rights within the Terra ecosystem. They can participate in voting on proposals and influence the decision-making process for the blockchain’s development.
  • Validator Network: Terra relies on a network of validators to secure the blockchain. LUNA holders can delegate their tokens to validators and earn rewards for securing the network.
  • Interoperability: Terra focuses on cross-chain compatibility, allowing assets to move seamlessly between different blockchains and ecosystems.
  • Mass Adoption: LUNA’s primary goal is to promote mass adoption of stablecoins and blockchain technology by providing a stable and reliable store of value.

Terra Luna Classic

On the other hand, Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) is a newer entrant into the Terra ecosystem. It was created as a result of a contentious hard fork in November 2022. The fork was driven by a group of Terra community members who disagreed with the direction of Terra’s development, primarily focusing on the decision to stabilize the LUNA token.

LUNC emerged as a more decentralized alternative to Terra Luna, aiming to prioritize decentralization and community governance. It aims to differentiate itself by not pegging its value to the US dollar and maintaining the original vision of Terra’s blockchain.

Key Features of Terra Luna Classic (LUNC):

  • Decentralization: LUNC places a strong emphasis on decentralization and community governance. It aims to maintain a more decentralized network compared to LUNA.
  • No Stablecoin Peg: Unlike LUNA, LUNC does not aim to maintain a stable value pegged to any fiat currency. It allows its value to fluctuate based on market dynamics.
  • Community-Driven: LUNC’s development and decision-making processes are more community-driven, giving its holders a greater say in the project’s direction.
  • Separate Development Team: LUNC has its development team and a distinct roadmap focused on community-driven features and improvements.
  • Flexibility: LUNC offers flexibility in terms of use cases and tokenomics, as it is not tied to the stability mechanisms and goals of Terra’s stablecoins.
  • Original Vision: LUNC seeks to preserve the original vision of Terra’s blockchain, which some community members felt had been compromised by the pursuit of stability.

Key Differences – Terra Luna (LUNA) Vs. Terra Luna Classic (LUNC)

  1. Stablecoin Peg:

Terra Luna (LUNA) is the collateral asset for TerraUSD (UST), which aims to maintain a stable 1:1 peg with the US dollar.

Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) does not aim to maintain a stable value pegged to any fiat currency, emphasizing a more decentralized approach.

  1. Governance:

LUNA holders have governance rights within the Terra ecosystem, allowing them to vote on proposals and participate in decision-making.

LUNC aims to be more community-driven and decentralized, giving its holders more influence over network decisions.

  1. Community Philosophy:

LUNA was designed with the goal of stability and mass adoption in mind, prioritizing stability over other considerations.

LUNC was born out of a desire for a more decentralized and community-driven blockchain, prioritizing its original vision.

  1. Development Roadmap:

Terra Luna (LUNA) follows a roadmap set by Terraform Labs, the primary development team behind Terra.

Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) has a separate development team and a roadmap focused on community-driven features.

  1. Use Cases:

LUNA primarily serves as collateral for TerraUSD and plays a central role in Terra’s stablecoin ecosystem.

LUNC’s use cases are still evolving, with a focus on community governance and development.


In the world of cryptos, innovation and adaptation are constants. Terra Luna and Terra Luna Classic are prime examples of how differences in vision and philosophy can lead to the creation of distinct tokens within the same blockchain ecosystem.

As the original and more stable-oriented token, Terra Luna continues to be a cornerstone of the Terra blockchain. At the same time, Terra Luna Classic represents a divergence in approach, focusing on decentralization and community governance.

Ultimately, the choice between Terra Luna and Terra Luna Classic depends on an individual’s priorities within the Terra ecosystem. LUNA may appeal to those who value stability and want to participate in governance decisions within Terra’s ecosystem. On the other hand, LUNC may attract those who seek a more decentralized and community-driven blockchain experience. As both tokens continue to develop, it will be fascinating to see how they evolve and compete in the ever-growing world of cryptos.

Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency is not a legal tender and is currently unregulated. Kindly ensure that you undertake sufficient risk assessment when trading cryptocurrencies as they are often subject to high price volatility. The information provided in this section doesn't represent any investment advice or WazirX's official position. WazirX reserves the right in its sole discretion to amend or change this blog post at any time and for any reasons without prior notice.
Participate in the Indian Crypto Movement. Share:

Leave a Reply

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.